The courier invoice arrives monthly, you pay it, done — and somewhere in there are the ₹90 weight re-bills and surcharge creep that nobody queried. Freight reconciliation is unglamorous, slightly tedious, and returns 2–8% of shipping spend to sellers who do it.

Where the over-billing hides

Weight disputes lead — the courier's scale says 2.1 kg where you booked 1.4. Then surcharge drift: fuel % that crept without a rate-card update, remote-area charges on pincodes that aren't, COD fees at a higher slab. Each is small; together they're a monthly leak.

The evidence that wins disputes

Your booking record (declared weight), a photo of the packed parcel on the scale, and the tracking timeline. Carriers fold on documented disputes; they stand firm on 'I think it was lighter'. The dispute process exists — sellers just rarely use it.

The monthly routine

Export bookings → match invoice lines → flag weight/fee discrepancies → raise disputes in writing → track credits. An hour monthly at 300 orders, and the disputed amounts are real: sellers recover ₹2,000–8,000/month routinely.

Why the tooling exists

This is exactly why Pakka Parcel builds reconciliation in — booking record vs invoice line automatically, discrepancies flagged not discovered. The audit that took an hour becomes the flagged list that takes ten minutes.

Pakka Parcel automates exactly this — the pipeline from order to AWB without the manual steps.

See how →

The playbook

1

Photo packed orders on the scale

The evidence file that wins disputes.

2

Match invoice lines to bookings

Weight and fee deltas flag themselves.

3

Dispute in writing, always

Verbal complaints die; written disputes credit.

4

Reconcile monthly

The leak compounds — catch it while the trail is fresh.